Grazing

Water quality and the Great Barrier Reef

Poor water quality, which can be caused by elevated levels of fine sediments, nutrients and pesticides, has a detrimental impact on Great Barrier Reef ecosystems, particularly freshwater, estuarine, coastal and inshore marine ecosystems. These environments provide critical ecosystem services and have high tourism, aesthetic, cultural, recreational and economic values.

How do land-based activities affect water quality?

The Great Barrier Reef catchment area has been modified by changes in land use over time. These modifications affect the type and amount of materials that runoff from the land and enter our waterways.

Land use change has increased the amount of fine sediment and particulate nutrients that reaches the Great Barrier Reef by 1.4–5 times compared to pre-development conditions (with variations depending on basins).

Land uses in the Great Barrier Reef catchments

Graph of land uses in the Great Barrier Reef catchments. 73% grazing, 1.2% sugarcane, 2.8% irrigated and dryland cropping, 0.2% horticulture and bananas, 0.7% urban and 22.1% other (conservation areas, forestry)

How do grazing lands contribute to overall pollutant loads?

Sediment and particulate nutrients can be delivered to the Great Barrier Reef from soil that enters river systems through hillslope, streambank and gully erosion. Land used for grazing is the largest contributor of fine sediments to the Great Barrier Reef because it is by far the biggest land use by area. Other intensive land uses (such as mining and urban areas) can generate large amounts of fine sediment locally but cover a smaller area. Grazing lands also contribute 22% of dissolved inorganic nitrogen exports, through increased erosion and transformation of particulate nutrients to dissolved form (termed ‘bioavailable nutrients’) during transport. While pesticides are used over large areas of grazing lands, the relative ecological toxicity of the dominant pesticide used (tebuthiuron), is low compared to other pesticides.

Fine sediment and particulate nutrient loads by land use

Graph of fine sediment and particulate nutrient loads by land use in the Great Barrier Reef catchments. 60% grazing, 10% sugarcane, 4% irrigated and dryland cropping, 1% horticulture and bananas, 2% urban and 23% other (conservation areas, forestry)

Dissolved inorganic nitrogen loads by land use

Graph of dissolved inroganic nutrient loads by land use in the Great Barrier Reef catchments. 22% grazing, 42% sugarcane, 0% irrigated and dryland cropping, 1% horticulture and bananas, 7% urban and 28% other (conservation areas, forestry)

How are changes to land-based runoff measured

Scientists use multiple lines of evidence to estimate changes over time

Monitoring graphic
Modelling graphic
Remote sensing graphic
Proxy records graphic
Geochemical and isotope tracing graphic

Which areas are the dominant sources of key pollutants associated with grazing?

The Burdekin and Fitzroy basins are by far the largest exporters of total fine sediment and particulate nutrients to the Great Barrier Reef (including anthropogenic exports) and a large proportion of these basins are used for grazing. Each basin exports a total annual average load of over 1,300 kilotonnes of fine sediment and more than 3,000 tonnes of particulate nitrogen. The Mary, Herbert and Burnett River basins are the next largest exporters of fine sediment to the Great Barrier Reef (up to 600 kilotonnes each year), and the Don, O’Connell, Johnstone and Normanby basins can export over 150 kilotonnes of fine sediments each yearnoting that the diversity in land use varies between these basins.

Herd of white Brahman cows standing in late afternoon sunlight in dry grassland
Herd of grazing cattle. Dawie Nolte

Drivers and transport pathways

Main drivers of sediment and particulate nutrient exports:

Overgrazing graphic

Overgrazing

Land clearing graphic

Land clearing

Tillage graphics

Tillage

Sediment sources:

Gully erosion 54%

Hillslope erosion 22%

Streambank erosion 24%

Management options

Actions are

most cost-effective

when targeted at hotspots

Reducing erosion reduces

both particulate and dissolved nutrients

Revegetation of streambanks and protecting existing vegetation

helps to reduce erosion

Large-scale remediation of gullies can reduce sediment exports by

more than 90%

within 1-2 years

Much of the export comes from a relatively small area. For example, in the Bowen catchment:


Effective management practices that lead to water quality improvements in grazing lands:

Moderate and adaptive stocking rates graphic

Moderate and adaptive stocking rates

Groundcover graphic

>70% ground cover

Rest period graphic

Regular periods of strategic rest from grazing

Cattle exclusion graphic

Cattle exclusion from fragile land-types

Pasture graphic

Improved soil health and pasture establishment

Buffers graphic

Vegetation buffers

These practices can lead to other co-benefits like improved soil health, higher levels of soil carbon and greater biodiversity

Potential ecosystem impacts

Fine sediment and particulate nutrients in flood plumes can reduce water clarity (increase turbidity). Changes to the quantity and quality of light in the water column can negatively affect organisms that depend on adequate light levels for growth and energy supplies (e.g. corals and seagrasses)

Water clarity improves with increasing distance from river mouths

The greatest impacts of fine sediments and particulate nutrients occur in the inshore central and southern Great Barrier Reef (Wet Tropics to Burnett Mary Natural Resource Management regions)

Increased sediment decreases abundance, diversity, spatial extent and recovery rates of inshore seagrass meadow and coral reef ecosystems, and their associated communities including fish and dugong

Burial or smothering of corals and seagrasses by sediment can cause tissue damage, reduce growth rates, and alter microbial communities. These impacts can be exacerbated by climate change pressures

Related questions and confidence ratings

Scroll to Top